We use Google Analytics
These cookies allow us measure how visitors use our website, which pages are popular, and what our traffic sources are. This helps us improve how our website works and make it easier for all visitors to find what they are looking for. The information is aggregated and anonymous, and cannot be used to identify you. If you do not allow these cookies, we will be unable to use your visits to our website to help make improvements.
These cookies are usually placed by third-party advertising networks, which may use information about your website visits to develop a profile of your interests. This information may be shared with other advertisers and/or websites to deliver more relevant advertising to you across multiple websites. If you do not allow these cookies, visits to this website will not be shared with advertising partners and will not contribute to targeted advertising on other websites.
You need these to sign in using Facebook.
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
Subscribe to our newsletter
You need to login first
Not a member yet?
This is an interesting piece about a remarkable decline in work hours. I think there is in addition a bifurcation between the highly-paid workers doing 90 hours/week and the modestly-paid workers doing 20-40 hours/week. The former may be lawyers, doctors, the finance industry and business owners. Their incentives are strong because the extra hours can deliver enormous salary and profit returns in their later careers. But for the modestly-paid, who may be manual workers in the hospitality industry (cleaners, waiters), or in construction or agriculture: extra hours may be unpleasant and tiring or boring, and even if they bring in some overtime pay, there is no chance of becoming rich later in life. So for the modestly-paid, a good welfare improvement is to reduce hours which may be effected by trade unions or through political representation.
This bifurcation explains the difference between the US where work hours on average stagnated between 1990 and 2019, while in most other countries they continued their secular fall. In the USA trade unions—never strong—have been weakened by direct political moves, and the class of entrepreneurs has grown faster than has the class of employees. So the pressures to reduce hours have been less in the USA than in other rich countries.
Peter_G_Moll - 2022 02 19
Sign up for our email newsletter
Receive updates when we publish new content along with other exclusive bits and pieces.